Archive for October, 2007

DEVOTION 2


1982309625.jpg

CLEAVING UNTO GOD

But cleave unto Jehovah your God, as ye have done unto this day (Joshua 23:8) – ASV.

A song writer said “leaning on the everlasting arms”. We have a strong arm to resort to in times of trouble. We are serving a mighty God who has the world in the palm of His hands. His power sustains all things and He outstretched the heights and the width of the universe.

These are the fare well words of Joshua for the children of Israel. The last word of a mighty man carries the potency which has the ability cause a great transformation in lives. Joshua ends his meaningful life on the earth with a will containing the specifications of how we must serve God.

To cleave comes from the Greek etymology dâbaq which means to abide, (holding fast together), follow close (hard, after), be joined (together), keep (fast), overtake, pursue hard, stick, take. Joshua exhorted them to hold fast unto Jehovah, that is, “delight in him, depend upon him, devote yourselves to his glory, and continue to do so to the end, as you have done unto this day, ever since you came to Canaan;”

In cleaving, we must hold fast on God’s word, worship, and ordinances; extrinsically, by true obedience and devotion to them, and firm examination of them; and intrinsically, by strong warmth to him, hope, trust, and confidence in him, expectation of all good things from him, and constant application to him for help in all times of need, and a fixed dependence on him: that is the only true way for us to experience the presence and power of God forever. A constant trust and confidence in God is the key for exploits. Joshua commanded them to put their faith hard to God and He will inevitably not fail them. The same applies to as follows of Christ. We must bank on His mercies and love so that the blessings annexing these virtues would be ours for the taking.

As ye have done unto this day; that is, since they came into the land of Canaan, and had been under the government of Joshua; for otherwise, while in the wilderness, they frequently revolted from God, and murmured against him; and this is to be understood not of individuals, who doubtless were guilty of various failings and sins, but of the whole body, and with respect to any notorious offence, particularly idolatry, which they had not fallen into since they came into the land of Canaan, and had very lately shown great zeal against it; not only the tribes on this side, but those on the other side Jordan, as the preceding chapter largely relates.

 

Comments (1) »

DITTY 2

WHY IS THE WORD “JUDGE” AN INACCURATE LABEL FOR THE LEADERS OF PRE-MONARCHIAL ISRAEL?

I agree without any shadow of doubt that the appellation given to the book judges is quite queer and imprecise. I choose this stand because of the following reasons:

The work of many of these “judges” doesn’t warrant them to be called judges. They need to be called DELIVERERS because they were used by God to deliver the Israelites from the tyranny of their enemies not to administer justice among the people in the land and as the name “judges” imply, it contains the history of the deliverance and government of Israel by the men who bore the title of the “judges.”

The judges were temporary and special deliverers, sent by God to deliver the Israelites from their oppressors; not supreme magistrates, succeeding to the authority of Moses and Joshua. Their power only extended over portions of the country, and some of them were contemporaneous.

Their first work and responsibility was that of deliverers and leaders in war; they then must administered justice to the people, and their authority supplied the want of a regular government. Though some like Deborah and Samuel (if I may add him to the judges) did administered Justice but many of these “judges” didn’t qualify that name.

Judges tells the story of 13 liberators of Israel from the oppression of foreign nations, who became the Judges or a correct name for them also is Governors… among them was a woman called Deborah.

This function of the Judges is also an office comparable to a king (but not anointed). In the Biblical context of the Book of Judges, the term designates those who act as deliverers. The word, however, means more than this: it refers to leaders who took charge of the affairs of the tribes in case of war, and who assumed leadership of their respective tribes in the succeeding times of peace. In accordance with the needs of the time, their functions were primarily martial and military. Though they somewhat administered justice among their own people but their functions and responsibilities was seemingly to lead the nation to outwit their enemies in times of war and to bring serenity to the nation as a whole.

 

REFERENCES:

Smiths Bible Dictionary

John Gills Exposition of the Bible

 

Comments (1) »

DEVOTION 1

 

1.jpg

A RENEWED STRENGTH AS THE EAGLE

As yet I am as strong this day as I as in the day that Moses sent me: as my strength was then, even so is my strength now, for war, and to go out and to come in. Joshua 14:11 (ASV)

These are the powerful words of a man who had been packaged with the power of an eagle. The eagle’s power and potency is beheld in its ability to be rejuvenated in strength. As Isaiah said, “and your strength would be renewed as eagle’s” (40:31). CALEB is his name and he is one of the two men who had inevitably enjoyed the providence and presence of God and this is the effect of their devotion and commitment to the will and purpose of God. A renewal of strength is only the reward of Christians who are ready to die for their faith and also a unique stand with regards to our commitment to the will of the Father.

Here Caleb earnestly requests for the land or territory of Hebron and alongside his request was his seemingly reminisce of who he really is vis-à-vis their peregrination from Egypt to where they’ve reached thus far. His unique personality and piety is revealed through his own witness of the justice and propriety of his conduct and that of his family. He was extra bold to explicate on his own unblemished and unquestionable character. Do we have the audacity and the effrontery expressed by Caleb? Can we be recommended by all and sundry re our walk with God and our talk about Him? Well! Caleb did it blatantly and he later on annexed his desire (the land of Hebron). We can glance at God’s providence and power on him via these statements of his:

I am as strong this day as I was in the day that Moses sent me:

This worthwhile statement proposes that Caleb was possessed with the clarity of mind, precision of thought, sense of direction and a retentive memory, and as hale, he was physically powerful, and robust in his body now, as he had been so long ago; these qualities are only given by God. This is a phenomenal expedition of rejuvenation and renewal which is a wonderful instance of the care of divine providence over him in upholding him in life, and continuing him in vigor, vitality and health at such an age, when the carcasses of so many thousands had pined away and fell in the wilderness. Folks, let us learn a great deal from the attitude and character of Caleb so that we can also flourish in the courts of our God as voiced out by David (Psalm 92:13).

As my strength was then, even so is my strength now for war:

He had the same strength of body and courage of mind to engage in warlike enterprises as he had so many years ago; and this he the rather mentions, to prevent any objection Joshua might make to the giving of Hebron to him, since being inhabited by giants, it required a large share of strength and courage to attempt the conquest of it: but Caleb had strength both to go out, and to come in; to do any civil business, to preside over his tribe, or to govern any city, and its appendages, that should be put into his hands. As instruments of God in a depraved and sinful world, we need God’s unction to function as He gave Caleb to execute what He pleases. Let’s strive to walk with God in order that “He will satisfy our desires with good things, so that our youth would be RENEWED like the eagle.

Comments (1) »

THIRDTERM – DITTY 1

WHY IS THE COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF CANAANITES (AND OTHERS) ORDERED BY YAHWEH? ISN’T HE A GOD OF MERCY AND LOVE?

The mercy and love of God is revealed through His covenant relationship with the Patriarchs and the children of Israel. The Old Testament is an agreement which existed between a particular nation via the call of Abraham. God went into a covenant with the children of Israel through Abraham and the covenant was that, He will bless those that bless him and his descendants and that “He will give him and his seeds the land of Canaan” (Gen. 13:15). The fulfillment of God’s promise to Abraham also in a great way expresses his mercifulness and love. The bible says He has exalted His word above His name and He will never break His promise. God is invariably bound by His words and He cannot do anything than to prove His faithfulness.

By wiping out the Canaanites, Jebusites, the Hittites, the Girgashites and the rest, a door is in turn opened for His people to enjoy His promise. There is no way the children of Israel can notch up the land of Canaan without wiping them out.

Again, the location of these nations mentioned are very proximate to the land of Canaan and they were idol worshippers and if they are not utterly destroyed, Israel would be attracted to their waywardness and cause the children of Israel to stumble (Deut. 7:2-5). God called the children of Israel into uniqueness and by allowing these nations to dwell peacefully, it would intend be an avenue of temptation for the people of God.

God is truly a God of mercy and love and that is why He doesn’t want the children of Israel to incur His wrath by opening unto them an opportunity for them to have any close amity with the Amorites, Jebusites, Gigarshites and the Canaanites. The mercy and love of God is antithetical to sin and anything that is seemingly sinful must be ostracized and blotted out by God.

These nations were sign post for the people of God to stray from God’s protection and the only way for God’s people to maximize their potentials and abide in the unadulterated and uncompromising presence of God was to remove all appearances of evil and temptations out of the way and these nations were no exceptions.

The Bible teaches that God is never cruel to anyone. We note in passing that God’s punishment of the wicked is not cruelty. His punishment demonstrates (shows) justice, not cruelty. Now, the fact that God is not cruel can be contradicted by human experience. Remember, human experience does not always consist of truth, (correct) conception, memory, reality and perception. It can instead consist of delusion, misconception, fantasy, imagination, illusion, and hallucination.

 

REFERENCES:

John Gills Exposition to the Bible

The life foundations nexus, when God is cruel – by Dr. Michael G. Bisconti

Comments (1) »

GILGAMESH EPIC – BAR CAMP NOTES

GILGAMESH EPIC

The Epic of Gilgamesh is a story about a Sumerian king (Gilgamesh) who seems to have lived around 2500 BC, in Mesopotamia. The story was probably made up not long after he died, but the oldest written copy of it that we still have dates to the Assyrian period (around 900 BC), and was found in the ruins of the palace of one of the Assyrian kings.

SUMMARY:

The Epic begins with Gilgamesh ruling the city of Uruk, but he is not doing a good job. Everyone is mad at him because he has a lot of girlfriends all at once, he spends all his time partying instead of working, and he is disrespectful to the elders in the city.

Then a messenger tells Gilgamesh about a wild man who is living out in the hills near the city. This wild man’s name is Enkidu. He goes naked or wears furs, and he drinks only water from the river. But he is very strong. Gilgamesh thinks this is interesting, so he sets a trap for Enkidu to get him to come to the city and be his friend.
Gilgamesh sends a beautiful woman to Enkidu, and when he sees her he kisses her and the kiss works like magic to tame him: he follows her back to the city and becomes civilized.

Now that Gilgamesh has a friend, Enkidu, he is not so bored anymore and he stops being mean to everyone and bothering the girls. Instead, Gilgamesh and Enkidu plan a big heroic trip to the West to get wood for building (because very little wood grew in Mesopotamia). They travel there and fight the great monster Humbaba.

When the two heroes get home, though, they begin to have problems. Gilgamesh is so cool now that the goddess Ishtar falls in love with him, but when she asks him to be her boyfriend, Gilgamesh says no (and he is pretty rude about it too). Ishtar is angry and she makes Enkidu die of a fever. Gilgamesh is very sad and upset that his friend died. And he is afraid that he will someday die too.

Finally Gilgamesh travels to the Land of the Dead to see if he himself can somehow live forever. While he is there, he meets a man named Utnapishtim, who tells Gilgamesh a story about a great flood. Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh that the gods sent this flood because people made too much noise on earth and hurt the gods’ ears. He himself survived the flood in a boat. (This is probably related to the story of Noah).

This is what one of the tablets that was found in the Assyrian king’s library looks like. This one tells the story of the Flood. Gilgamesh finds out that he can live forever if he can stay awake for a week watching this plant. But he falls asleep in the end. He goes back to his city, still sad but realizing that everyone has to die sometime, and he goes back to being a good king.

THE STORY IN FULL:

  1. The story starts with an introduction of Gilgamesh of Uruk, the greatest king on earth, two-thirds god and one-third human, as the strongest King-God who ever existed. The introduction describes his glory and praises the brick city walls of Uruk. The people in the time of Gilgamesh, however, are not happy. They complain that he is too harsh and abuses his power by sleeping with women before their husbands do, so the goddess of creation Aruru creates the wild-man Enkidu. Enkidu starts bothering the shepherds. When one of them complains to Gilgamesh the king sends the woman Shamhat who might have been a priestess/prostitute (a nadītu or hierodule in Greek). The body contact with Shamhat civilizes Enkidu, and after several nights, he is no longer a wild beast who lives with animals. In the meanwhile, Gilgamesh has some strange dreams, his mother Ninsun explains them by telling that a mighty friend will come to him.
  2. Enkidu and Shamhat leave the wilderness for Uruk to attend a wedding. When Gilgamesh comes to the party to sleep with the bride, he finds his way blocked by Enkidu. Enkidu and Gilgamesh fight each other. After a mighty battle, Gilgamesh breaks off from the fight (or defeats Enkidu in other versions, this portion is missing from the Standard Babylonian version but is supplied from other versions).
  3. Gilgamesh proposes to travel to the Cedar Forest to cut some great trees and kill a demon Humbaba for their glory. Enkidu objects but can not convince his friend. They seek the wisdom of the Elder Council, but Gilgamesh remains stubborn. Enkidu gives in and both prepare to journey to Cedar Forest. Gilgamesh tells his mother, who complains about it, but then asks the sun-god Shamash for support and gives Enkidu some advice. She also adopts Enkidu as her second son.
  4. Gilgamesh and Enkidu journey to the Cedar Forest. On the way, Gilgamesh has five bad dreams, but due to the bad construction of the tablet, they are hard to reconstruct. Enkidu, each time, explains the dreams as a good omen. When they reach the forest Enkidu becomes afraid again and Gilgamesh has to encourage him.
  5. When the heroes finally run into Humbaba, the demon/ogre guardian of the trees, the monster starts to offend them. This time, Gilgamesh is the one to become afraid. After some brave words of Enkidu the battle commences. Their rage separated Syria mountains from the Lebanon. Finally Shamash sends his 13 winds to help the two heroes and Humbaba is defeated. The monster begs Gilgamesh for his life, and Gilgamesh pities the creature. Enkidu, however, gets mad with Gilgamesh and asks him to kill the beast. Humbaba then turns to Enkidu and begs him to persuade his friend to spare his life. When Enkidu repeats his request to Gilgamesh, Humbaba curses them both before Gilgamesh puts an end to it. When the two heroes cut a huge tree, Enkidu makes a huge door of it for the gods and lets it float down the river.
  6. Gilgamesh rejects the sexual advances of Anu’s daughter, the goddess Ishtar, because of what happened to her previous lovers like Dumuzi. Ishtar asks her father Anu to send the “Bull of Heaven” to avenge the rejected sexual advances. When Anu rejects her complaints, Ishtar threatens to raise the dead. Anu becomes scared and gives in. The bull of heaven is a plague for the lands. Apparently the creature has something to do with drought because, according to the epic, the water disappeared and the vegetation drought. Whatever the case, Gilgamesh and Enkidu, this time without divine help, slay the beast and offer its heart to Shamash. When they hear Ishtar cry out in agony, Enkidu tears off the bull’s hindquarter and throws it in her face and threatens her. The city Uruk celebrates, but Enkidu has a bad dream detailed in the next tablet.
  7. In the dream of Enkidu, the gods decide that somebody has to be punished for killing the Bull of Heaven and Humbaba, in the end they decide to punish Enkidu. All of this is much against the will of Shamash. Enkidu tells Gilgamesh all about it, and then curses the door he made for the gods. Gilgamesh is shocked and goes to temple to pray to Shamash for the health of his Friend. Enkidu then starts to curse the trapper and Shamhat because now he regrets the day that he became human. Shamash speaks from the heaven and points out how unfair Enkidu is; he also tells him that Gilgamesh will become a shadow of his former self because of his death. Enkidu regrets his curses and blesses Shamhat. He becomes more and more ill and describes the Netherworld as he is dying.
  8. Gilgamesh delivers a lamentation for Enkidu, offering gifts to the many gods, in order that they might walk beside Enkidu in the netherworld.
  9. Gilgamesh sets out to avoid Enkidu’s fate and makes a perilous journey to visit Utnapishtim and his wife, the only humans to have survived the Great Flood who were granted immortality by the gods, in the hope that he too can attain immortality. Along the way, Gilgamesh passes the two mountains from where the sun rises, which are guarded by two scorpion-beings. They allow him to proceed and he travels through the dark where the sun travels every night. Just before the sun is about to catch up with him, he reaches the end. The land at the end of the tunnel is a wonderland full of trees with leaves of jewels.
  10. Gilgamesh meets the alewyfe Siduri and tells her the purpose of his journey. Siduri attempts to dissuade him from his quest but sends him to Urshanabi the ferryman to help him cross the sea to Utnapishtim. Urshanabi is in the company of some stone-giants. Gilgamesh considers them hostile and kills them. When he tells Urshanabi his story and asks for help. He is told that he just killed the only creatures able to cross the Waters of Death. The waters of death are not to be touched, so Urshanabi commands him to cut 300 trees and fashion them into oars so that they can cross the waters by picking a new oar each time. Finally they reach the island of Utnapishtim. Utnapishtim sees that there is someone else in the boat, and asks Gilgamesh who he is. Gilgamesh tells him his story and asks for help, but Utnapishtim reprimands him because fighting the fate of humans is futile and ruins the joy in life.
  11. Gilgamesh argues that Utnapishtim is not different from him and asks him his story, why he has a different fate. Utnapishtim tells him about the great flood. His story is a summary of the story of Atrahasis (see also Gilgamesh flood myth) but skips the previous plagues sent by the gods. He reluctantly offers Gilgamesh a chance for immortality, but questions why the gods would give the same honor as himself, the flood hero, to Gilgamesh and challenges Gilgamesh to stay awake for six days and seven nights first. However, just when Utnapishtim finishes his words Gilgamesh falls asleep. Utnapishtim ridicules the sleeping Gilgamesh in the presence of his wife and tells her to bake a loaf of bread for every day he is asleep so that Gilgamesh cannot deny his failure. When Gilgamesh, after six days and seven nights discovers his failure, Utnapishtim is furious with him and sends him back to Uruk with Urshanabi in exile. The moment that they leave, Utnapishtim’s wife asks her husband to have mercy on Gilgamesh for his long journey. Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh of a plant at the bottom of the ocean that will make him young again. Gilgamesh obtains the plant by binding stones to his feet so he can walk the bottom of the sea. He does not trust the plant and plans to test it on an old man’s back in Uruk. Unfortunately he places the plant on the shore of a lake while he bathes, and it is stolen by a serpent which loses his old skin and thus is reborn. Gilgamesh weeps in the presence of Urshanabi. Having failed at both opportunities, he returns to Uruk, where the sight of its massive walls prompts him to praise this enduring work to Urshanabi.
  12. Note that the content of the last tablet is not connected with previous ones. Gilgamesh complains to Enkidu that his ball-game-toys fell in the underworld. Enkidu offers to bring them back. Delighted, Gilgamesh tells Enkidu what he must and must not do in the underworld in order to come back. Enkidu forgets the advice and does everything he was told not to do. The underworld keeps him. Gilgamesh prays to the gods to give him his friend back. Enlil and Sin don’t bother to reply but Enki and Shamash decide to help. Shamash cracks a hole in the earth and Enkidu jumps out of it. The tablet ends with Gilgamesh questioning Enkidu about what he has seen in the underworld. The story doesn’t make clear if Enkidu reappears only as a ghost or really comes alive again.

Storytelling, the Meaning of Life,
and the Epic of Gilgamesh

Arthur A. Brown

Stories do not need to inform us of anything. They do inform us of things. From The Epic of Gilgamesh, for example, we know something of the people who lived in the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in the second and third millenniums BCE. We know they celebrated a king named Gilgamesh; we know they believed in many gods; we know they were self-conscious of their own cultivation of the natural world; and we know they were literate. These things we can fix — or establish definitely. But stories also remind us of things we cannot fix — of what it means to be human. They reflect our will to understand what we cannot understand, and reconcile us to mortality.

We read The Epic of Gilgamesh, four thousand years after it was written, in part because we are scholars, or pseudo-scholars, and wish to learn something about human history. We read it as well because we want to know the meaning of life. The meaning of life, however, is not something we can wrap up and walk away with.

To see for ourselves the meaning of a story, we need, first of all, to look carefully at what happens in the story; that is, we need to look at it as if the actions and people it describes actually took place or existed. We can articulate the questions raised by a character’s actions and discuss the implications of their consequences. But we need to consider, too, how a story is put together — how it uses the conventions of language, of events with beginnings and endings, of description, of character, and of storytelling itself to reawaken our sensitivity to the real world. The real world is the world without conventions, the unnameable, unrepresentable world — in its continuity of action, its shadings and blurrings of character, its indecipherable patterns of being. The stories that mean most to us bring us back to our own unintelligible and yet immeasurably meaningful lives

History

Gilgamesh’s supposed historical reign is believed to lie within the period 2700 BC to 2500 BC, 200-400 years before the earliest known written stories. The discovery of artifacts associated with Agga and Enmebaragesi of Kish, two other kings named in the stories, has lent credibility to the historical existence of Gilgamesh

The history of the epic is often divided into three periods: old, middle, and late. Many versions exist from this almost 2,000 year span, but only the old and the late periods have yielded significant enough finds to enable a coherent translation. Therefore, the old Babylonian version, and what is now referred to as the standard edition, are the most frequently utilized texts. However, the standard edition has become the basis of modern translations, and the old version only supplements the standard version when the lacunae – or gaps in the cuneiform tablet – are great.

The earliest Sumerian versions of the epic date from as early as the Third Dynasty of Ur (2150 BC-2000 BCE) (Dalley 1989: 41-42). The earliest Akkadian versions are dated to the early second millennium (Dalley 1989: 45). The “standard” Akkadian version, consisting of twelve tablets, was edited by Sin-liqe-unninni sometime between 1300 BC and 1000 BC and was found in the library of Ashurbanipal in Nineveh.

The Epic of Gilgamesh is widely known today. The first modern translation of the epic was in the 1870s by George Smith. More recent translations into English include one undertaken with the assistance of the American novelist John Gardner, and John Maier, published in 1984. In 2001, Benjamin Foster produced a reading in the Norton Critical Edition Series that fills in many of the blanks of the standard edition with previous material. The most definitive standard edition is the carefully edited two volume critical work by Andrew George. This represents the fullest treatment of the standard edition material, and he discusses at length the archaeological state of the material, provides a tablet by tablet exegesis, and furnishes a dual language side by side translation. George’s translation was also published in a general reader edition under the Penguin Classics imprint in 2003. In 2004, Stephen Mitchell released a controversial edition, which is his interpretation of previous scholarly translations into what he calls “a new English version.

Standard version

The standard version was found in the library of Ashurbanipal in Nineveh. It was written in standard Babylonian, a dialect of Akkadian that was only used for literary purposes. This version was standardized by Sin-liqe-unninni sometime between 1300 BCE and 1000 BCE out of the older versions to one official one. This was a common process in this time and Gilgamesh was no exception. The standard and earlier Akkadian versions are differentiated based on the opening words, or incipit. The older version begins with the words “Surpassing all other kings”, while the standard version’s incipit is “He who saw the deep” (ša nagbu amāru). The Akkadian word nagbu, “deep”, is probably to be interpreted here as referring to “unknown mysteries”. However, Andrew George believes that it refers to the specific knowledge that Gilgamesh brought back from his meeting with Uta-Napishti: he gains there knowledge of the realm of Ea, whose cosmic realm is seen as the fountain of wisdom (George 1999: L [pg. 50 of the introduction]). In general, interpreters feel that Gilgamesh was given knowledge of how to worship the gods, of why death was ordained for human beings, of what makes a good king, and of the true nature of how to live a good life. The eleventh (XI) tablet contains the flood myth that was mostly copied from the Epic of Atrahasis.

The twelfth tablet is appended to the epic representing a sequel to the original eleven, and was most probably added at a later date. This tablet has commonly been omitted until recent years. It has the startling narrative inconsistency of introducing Enkidu alive, and bears seemingly little relation to the well-crafted and finished 11 tablet epic; indeed, the epic is framed around a ring structure in which the beginning lines of the epic are quoted at the end of the 11th tablet to give it at the same time circularity and finality. Tablet 12 is actually a near copy of an earlier tale, in which Gilgamesh sends Enkidu to retrieve some objects of his from the Underworld, but Enkidu dies and returns in the form of a spirit to relate the nature of the Underworld to Gilgamesh – an event which seems to many superfluous given Enkidu’s dream of the underworld in Tablet VII.

Old-Babylonian version

All tablets, except for the second and third, are from different origins than the above, so this summary is made up out of different versions.

  1. Tablet missing
  2. Gilgamesh tells his mother Ninsun about two nightmares he had. His mother explains that they mean that a friend will come to Uruk. In the meanwhile Enkidu and his woman (here called Shamshatum) are making love. She civilizes him in company of the shepherds by offering him human food. Enkidu helps the shepherd by guarding the sheeps. They go to Uruk to marry but Gilgamesh want to use his privileges to sleep with Shamshatum first. Enkidu and Gilgamesh battle but Gilgamesh breaks off the fight. Enkidu praises Gilgamesh as special person.
  3. The tablet is broken here but it seems that Gilgamesh has offered the plan to go the cedar forest to cut trees and kill Humbaba. Enkidu protests, he knows Humbaba and is aware of his power. Gilgamesh talks Enkidu into it with some words of encouragement but Enkidu remains reluctant. They start preparation and call for the elders. The elders also protest but after Gilgamesh talks to them they wish him good luck.
  4. 1(?) tablet missing
  5. Fragments from two different versions/tablets that tell how Enkidu encourages Gilgamesh to slay Humbaba. When Gilgamesh does so thay cut some trees and find the dwellings of the Annunaki. Enkidu cuts a door of wood for Enlil and let it float down the Euphrates.
  6. Tablets missing
  7. Gilgamesh argues with Shamash the futility of his quest. The tablet is damaged. We then find Gilgamesh talking with Siduri about his quest and his travel to Ut-Napishtim (here called Uta-na’ishtim). Siduri also questions his goals. Another hole in the text. Gilgamesh has smashed the stone creatures and talks to the ferryman Urshanabi (here called Sur-sunabu). After a short discussion Sur-sunabu asks Gilgamesh to cut 300 oars so that they may cross the waters of dead without the stone creatures. The rest of the tablet is damaged.
  8. Tablet(s) missing

Influence on later epic literature

According to the Greek scholar Ioannis Kordatos, there are a large number of parallel verses as well as themes or episodes which indicate a substantial influence of the Epic of Gilgamesh on the Odyssey, the Greek epic poem ascribed to Homer.

Comments (1) »

QUIZ # 8

1. WHAT MOUNTAIN IS PROBABLY THE “MOUNT SINAI” MENTIONED IN EXODUS?
WHY IS THIS THE MOST PREFERRED?

Jebel Musa Mountain is the chosen Mount representing Mount Sinai and this is chosen and preferred by diverse scholars because of the magnificent presence of some granite development and arrangement of this massif or geographical formation which explains a block of the earth’s crust bounded by faults and shifted to form peaks of a mountain range.

Again the presence of the extensive plain at its base attests the premise that Jebel Musa is the same site for Mount Sinai.

2. TRACE THE ROUTE OF THE EXODUS AND GIVE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WHAT HAPPENED AT A PARTICULAR PLACE.

After they beheld the overthrow of the Egyptians, they moved to the Desert of Shur. This journey from Jibel Musa to Shur was a forty mile journey; probably the Israelites embarked on this journey without stopping. A nine mile journey was made again till they reached a desert place called el Ati and it was there and then they approached the bitter waters of MARAH.

Waters of Marah: The Israelites were obviously tired and thirsty so there, they chided against Moses and God showed Moses what to do to quench the thirst of the Israelites. Marah was an oasis with bitter and undrinkable water three days journey from the Red Sea crossing into the Desert of Shur. (Exodus 15:22-25) Moses sweetened the water by throwing into it a piece of wood.

From the desert of Shur, they came to Elim which was situated between the deserts of Shur and the wilderness of sin.

ELIM: This was an oasis of 12 springs and seventy palm (Exodus 15:27). While no time lapse is defined, the way the Bible reads the most time lapsed was between Marah and Elim. We don’t know how long they camped at Elim but I’m betting they were traveling anywhere from 30 to 60 days to get there. Here, they encamped by the waters of Elim. This site has at least twelve rivers to satisfy the big crowd and their families.

The Desert of Sin: After leaving Egypt the Israelites left Elim to wander the Desert of Sin (Exodus 16: 1). The wilderness of sin lies between Elim and Sinai. During these wanderings God delivered manna and quail for their nourishment after they have greatly murmured against Moses and Aaron.

Rephidim: From the wilderness of Sin, they came to Rephidim where they started their chidings again against Moses because they were thirsty. No water here. Moses strikes a rock with his shepherd’s staff and water springs forth. Or, did that happen at Mt. Horeb (Mt Sinai)? (Exodus 17:5-7) But first, before Moses scouts ahead to find the water-rock, they must battle the Amalekites.

Defeating the Amalekites: The Amalekites saw a threat from this huge Israelite population. To quash the threat they assembled their armies and followed the Israelites to Rephidim. During the battle Moses held high his shepherd’s staff with help from Aaron and Hur ands this brought a great victory for them, but when his hands were heavy and he let down his arm, the Amalekites prevailed (Exodus 17:8-13)

Mt. Sinai: It took them three months, to the day from leaving Egypt, perhaps a ten-day journey from Rephidim, to arrive at the foot of Mt. Sinai. (Exodus 19:1-2)

Comments (1) »